Gregoire Barrere vs Francisco Comesana Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Apr at 04:13 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Barrere vs F. Comesana

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ARG
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Barrere 0 - 1 Comesana
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gregoire Barrere winning 0 and Francisco Comesana winning 2. The last match between Francisco Comesana and Gregoire Barrere was at the Oeiras 4 Challenger, 18-04-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Francisco Comesana getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Barrere | 0 |
| Comesana | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Oeiras 4 Challenger(04-18-25)
G. Barrere vs F. Comesana H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,477,590 | Career Prize Money | $1,039,600 |
| 56.45% (468-361) | Career Total W/L | 62.92% (297-175) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 12 | Titles | 10 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.24% (19-23) |
G. Barrere vs F. Comesana Match Preview:
How does the prowess on the second serve shape our match predictions? In the last six months, Comesana has clinched an impressive 48.55% of points from their second serve. In contrast, Barrere trails slightly behind with 43.94%. This statistic carries weight when forecasting match outcomes, indicating a slight edge for Comesana in second serve resilience under pressure.
How well do these players capitalize on their return game opportunities? Recent stats reveal that Comesana has seized 45.29% of points when faced with an opponent's second serve. Meanwhile, Barrere displays a marginal advantage by securing 47.38% in similar situations. When it comes to returning first serves, Comesana manages 26.76%, whereas Barrere notches up 25.18%. These figures not only provide insights into their returning capabilities but also suggest who might be the favored player in head-to-head matchups.
When breakpoints arise, how do these athletes fare under pressure? Reflecting on the recent form, Comesana demonstrates toughness by saving 56.11% of breakpoints. Barrere closely follows with a 55.43% save rate. Such numbers offer a glimpse into potential in-game betting strategies, highlighting Comesana's slight defensive edge during critical junctures.
What does the overall performance overview tell us over the past year? Comesana boasts a robust 60.81% match win rate, reflecting a 45-29 win-loss record, whereas Barrere commands a 50% win rate, presenting a 27-27 win-loss tally. These statistics are pivotal for forming an overarching head-to-head prediction, favoring Comesana's consistency.
How do these competitors perform across various surfaces? With a distinct liking for clay, Comesana enjoys a career win percentage of 66% (256-134), while struggling on indoor hard courts with no wins recorded (0-1). Barrere, contrary to Comesana, thrives on indoor hard courts with a 61% win rate (210-134) and experiences a decrease on hard courts, maintaining a 52% win average (89-83). Surface preferences might tip the balance depending on the match conditions.
Delving into player levels, where have these athletes tested their mettle? Comesana, competing predominantly in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, exhibits a 69.77% success rate (30-13), whereas Barrere shows a 54.29% win record (19-16) under similar conditions. Event level disparities reveal comprehensive insights into performance probabilities.
When talking about the caliber of opponents, what does the comparative analysis show? Comesana has faced rivals with an average rank of 195.88 over the past year, while Barrere's opponents average slightly higher ranks at 198.39. Although relatively minor, these figures subtly underscore the caliber of competition faced by each contender.
Should the match extend into a deciding set, who might emerge victorious? In these pressure-cooked scenarios, Comesana prevails 71% of the time over the past 12 months, edging Barrere, who holds a 62% success rate in deciding sets. Live bettors might lean towards Comesana should the match reach this climax.
For those actively engaged in current events, past performances blend with current form to shape match outcomes. Additionally, considering each player's historical vibrancy at certain events should be integral to any prediction. Finally, with conditions ripe for breakpoints, Comesana converts 31.34% of his chances on serve break opportunities, while Barrere uses his chances slightly better at 31.45%. As these competitors ready for their showdown, statistical insights suggest a razor-thin advantage for Comesana.
Gregoire Barrere vs Francisco Comesana Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Barrere vs F. Comesana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:42:38 | Average Match Time | 1:42:38 |
| 62% (48/77) | 1st Serve % | 66% (52/79) |
| 58% (28/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (36/52) |
| 55% (16/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 39% (31/79) | Return Points Win % | 43% (33/77) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Barrere Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 7-6(8) | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
F. Comesana Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 3-6 7-6(10) | ||

G. Barrere vs F. Comesana Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.45% (468/361) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.92% (297/175) |
| 54.87% (1088/895) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.15% (652/432) |
| 51.74% (9989/9319) | Games Win/Loss | 53.61% (5466/4729) |
| 51.45% (89/84) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.83% (28/25) |
| 54.25% (134/113) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.19% (264/141) |
| 60.11% (223/148) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 57.89% (22/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 2949 | Aces Total | 1503 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1613 | Total Double Faults | 816 |
| 1:9:28 | Average Match Time | 1:32:35 |
| 483.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 346.83 |
| 61% (28102/45929) | 1st Serve % | 66% (18227/27507) |
| 71% (19827/28102) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12231/18227) |
| 51% (9076/17827) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4632/9280) |
| 41% (1721/4244) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1334/3057) |
| 38% (17510/45956) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11843/28222) |
| 45.90% (28/33) | Slam W/L | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 38.46% (10/16) | Masters W/L | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 51.72% (60/56) | Main Tour W/L | 41.03% (16/23) |
| 54.66% (176/146) | Challenger W/L | 66.25% (106/54) |
| 63.82% (194/110) | Futures W/L | 66.09% (154/79) |
| 57% (454/792) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (285/448) |
| 36% (12/33) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (7/14) |
| 49% (162/328) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (69/135) |
| 53% (148/281) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (75/128) |
| 85% (457/387) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (284/256) |
| 15% (457/67) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (284/28) |
| 21% (372/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
